Profilbild Ludmila Ceban
Ludmila Ceban 14 februari / 2017

Entitlement to equal and fair governance

Growing up in a post-soviet environment, you see how lengthy and cumbersome service delivery is when you deal with government authorities. You see that mechanisms for appeal are hardly a threat to bureaucracies. And you tolerate it, because the demand for accountability is typically low and it’s not like your rights and entitlement to fair and responsible administrations are spelled out to you in post-soviet schools either. At least that wasn’t the case in my school. ‘’A low commitment to providing quality public services is one of the main characteristics of the most inequitable countries in the world’’ as the newly issued World Development Report 2017 neatly phrases it.

If we look at the evidence from Ukraine, where assessments on administrative service delivery were run in several cities throughout the country in the framework of the FBA’s project on the rule of law and local governance, we see how reluctantly people respond to questions specifically related to corruption and ethics. In some cases over 50 percent of the respondents have refrained from answering. Many reasons for that, but a shaken sense of entitlement can certainly be one of them.

The situation varies across the country and while you can benefit from fairly expedient services in more developed and innovation-driven cities such as Ivano-Frankivsk in the west and Kharkiv in eastern Ukraine, you would still expect more transparent procedures, better communication channels with local authorities and more effective appeal mechanisms.

Access to services is much worse in the war affected areas however. Here retaining your property and housing rights for example has become a struggle. Applications submitted by internally displaced persons to the European Court of Human Rights reportedly often result in non-admissible cases. Particularly obscure procedures are imposed on people claiming basic services such as getting birth and death certificates. So what are you entitled to really when the normality of war is taking over?

It is telling that studies taking a micropolitical approach on conflict analysis reveal that people tend to carry on with their lives during war, whereby ‘’common crimes will often continue, people will get married, children will be born, couples will divorce and people will die’’. With plenty of narratives describing everyday life in eastern Ukraine however, among the strongest fears of around 800 000 people residing in the most war-affected areas is being ‘’forgotten by authorities, but also by the international community’’.

Yet, forgotten they may be, should the draft law “On the Temporarily Occupied Territory of Ukraine” be adopted in its current shape. The draft law has alarmed civil society and international partners due to potential negative effects, among others on humanitarian assistance and failure to guarantee basic rights and legal protection of citizens residing in the non-government controlled areas. Ensuring fundamental rights and access to fair services should remain the government’s priority and in line with the interests of the state.

FBA has been supporting Ukrainian partners in promoting rights based service delivery for over two years now. We work with both local and national authorities and as of recently we are part of the working group on civil-military administrations in eastern Ukraine of the Parliamentary Committee on State-Building, Regional Policy, and Local Self-Government. Strengthening the respect for rule of law principles in local governance across the country remains critical. This might strongly depend, however, on the actual demand for accountability and the sense of entitlement people have for more just interactions with the state.

av Ludmila Ceban
Profilbild Ludmila Ceban

Skrivet av Ludmila Ceban

Ludmila arbetar för närvarande med projektet Local Self-Government and the Rule of Law in Ukraine. Hon är placerad på FBA:s program för rättsstatsuppbyggnad och utbildad i statsvetenskap och Europastudier. Ludmila intresserar sig främst för policyutveckling, rättsstatsuppbyggnad i konflikt- och post-konfliktländer och reformprocesser i Östeuropa.

Fler inlägg av Ludmila Ceban

Elections aside, more focus on the rule of law needed in Ukraine

5 april, 2019

During the presidential elections in Ukraine on March 31, 2 690 violations of the electoral law were reported to the police. The Central Electoral Commission received over 130 complaints. But the appeals, complaints and their effectiveness haven’t necessarily made the headlines in the view of the actual election results. The type of complaints, however, coupled […]

Escalation in Ukraine

18 december, 2018

No one could have missed the recent escalated Russian aggression against Ukraine. While the daily casualties in Donbas (reportedly over 1300 ceasefire violations per day) tend to receive less media coverage, the declared martial law covering ten regions of Ukraine came as a reality check of sorts. Possible limitations on individual rights and freedoms remain […]

Conflict resources and the rule of law

18 maj, 2018

Over 40 per cent of all intrastate conflicts have a link to natural resources and, while it is not new evidence as such, less than a quarter of peace negotiations actually aim to resolve conflicts by addressing resource management mechanisms. By the same token, links to natural resources are rarely included in the design of […]

Fler inlägg

Senaste inläggen

Alla inlägg
Profilbild Klara Grenhagen
Klara Grenhagen 4 april / 2024

Moçambique – extremism och våldets svårlösta ekvation

Våldet eskalerar i norra Moçambique. Under årets två första månader skördades nästan lika många dödsoffer som under hela fjolåret. Halshuggningar, brända byar, långa följen av flyende människor och svarta IS-flaggor som vajar i övertagna områden. Efter sju år av våldsamma attacker fortsätter ett komplext konfliktsystem att veckla ut sig, med konsekvenser för hela regionen. Vi […]